【專訪】楊念群：談清代“一包養網心得年夜一統”觀念的構成

Yang Nianqun:In terms of method, how to treat “big unity” “It is indeed a relatively new point of entry. In the past, there were many scholars who discussed or mentioned “big sect” in the historical community, but there were relatively few people who used it as a way to treat it instead of just applying it as a descriptive concept. In this regard, some previous research and general practices combined “big sect” into The problem of border sysfunction or border management, but I think the concept of “big sysfunction” is actually very complicated, and the contents are unusually rich. Therefore, it is necessary to expand the connotation of “big sysfunction” and sort out the various expressions in concepts and practices from a few deeper levels. Of course, to understand what “big sysfunction” is, you must also expand your vision and put it into practice. It is placed in the framework of “regular theory” for analysis, because I regard “big monolithic” as a way of expressing the theory of the traditional rulers.

I tried to discuss from the perspective of re-examining the “big monolithic” view, and it is also because I don’t think that some discussions about “China” and “national” are very full. href=”https://twsweetdating99.org/”>Bao Shengxiang. For example, some discussions on the concept of “China” today can be seen and have very specific content, just like discussing the origin of “China” from the perspective of archaeological discovery, but the discussion on how the concept of “China” changes generally seems to be too scheming. It seems that the master has not explained what “China” is. Maybe the difficulty is that , the connotation of “China” in history has been constantly changing, and it is indeed not difficult to clearly define it. But why does the concept of “China” change and how does it change? How do we finally master “China” during the evolution process? Now there is still a discussion among the public, each talking, without any discussion. When the teacher discusses, the face of “China” becomes more ambiguous. So, why does such a strange phenomenon occur?

Baobao.com The discussion test picture of this book gives a preliminary answer to this. I think that discussing the question of “what is China” will suffer from a special difficulty. First, “China” is a concept formed by the King of Zhou as the Central Committee, and at the beginning it was just the Zhou Dynasty. href=”https://twsugargirl.org/”>Sweetheart Garden a “point” in the capital. This point of the surrounding area formed the Zhou king’s Huaxia family network, which excludes the non-Huaxia ethnic group. Secondly, the “national” is larger than the “China”, so the “national” design includes non-Huaxia ethnic groups such as Fifty-Yi. Because “China” emphasizes the “point”, “national” introduces the “national” a few ethnic groups such as Fifty-Yi, Fifty-Yi, with four targets, which is equivalent to bringing the “China” point Integration spreads to the surrounding environment and space, so it is more like a “surface”. “The whole country” is larger than the “China” scope, and it can be said to be a “China” with an automatic sense of purpose. The difficulty in grasping differences with the connotation of “China”, “the whole country” has more imaginative elements, and the focus of “the whole country” is 博官网 includes “Jiuzhou” and “Five Couples”, but the two concepts are proposed based on a fantasy design. Although modern maps have been created based on the concept of “Jiuzhou”, it marks many economic and geologic elements, such as roads, property distribution, etc., the scope of “Jiuzhou” and some pre-Qin marquis. The borders of the country also have mutual connections. However, with the evolution of historical processes, the “national” obviously cannot reflect the distribution of economic crops and changes in the course of thousands of years, so there is no actual reference value. Compared with “Jiuzhou”, the “Five Couples” are a political design that surrounds the Zhou kings in the middle, from near to far, and from level to level, and are basically a format that confronts “China” and “Free Wild”. I think these two concepts are Breeding Market Imagined in the pre-Qin literature, and there is no way to implement it to a specific level. This is what I think there is no way to discuss “national” in detail. The biggest reason for “China”.

So I want to make a new attempt in this book, which is to use the concept of “big unity” to express the overall evolution of Chinese history from the beginning. In fact, I want to implement the two concepts of “China” and “national”. Specifically, I want to make The “China” in the middle of the Xia Dynasty, combined with the “national” of the French-Shao people, Na has entered a practical framework of space and time interspersing with each other and is positioned from the head. From the perspective of “big sect” and using “big sect” as a way to replace the discussion of “China” and “national” is largely considered. First, “Year The Night One Sect” has accepted the connotation of “China” and “National” concepts, but it is different from these two concepts. We should not only understand “big zodiac” as a system of concepts, but should regard it as a specific implementation process. Secondly, compared with the “China” and “National” concepts, “big zodiac” is the main concept of the uprightness of the dynasties in the dynasties.and practical behavior. Every emperor must answer the question at the beginning of his ascension. What is the basis for the creation of the dynasty that governs itself? The suggestion of “orthodox” is a factor in the establishment of a regular view, which of course also includes the understanding of “China” and “national”, but pay more attention to the corresponding relationship and organic combination between concepts and concrete reality. The explanation of the relationship between “orthodox view” and “big unity” will also help fight the concept of “China” to eliminate the narrowness of the non-Hu